It is widely accepted that there are certain basic human rights common to all citizens. Until recently there was no single piece of UK legislation dealing with these rights. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought into force the European legislation on human rights.
The European Convention On Human Rights
The European Convention sets out the basic human rights considered to be fundamental to a civilised society. The human rights contained in the Convention are not necessarily absolute and may be limited or qualified depending on the circumstances. Rights may be categorised as follows:
- Absolute rights, which are so fundamental that they may never be overridden;
- Limited rights, which may be overridden in some specific circumstances;
- Qualified rights, which may be overridden if it is necessary to do so to give effect to a law or in the interests of society.
The Human Rights Act 1998
The Human Rights Act came into force in 2000. The Act gives effect to the European Convention on Human Rights and adopts the same basic rights as set out in the Convention.
The purpose of the Human Rights Act is to ensure that public authorities respect the human rights of individuals and that individuals have recourse to the UK courts if their rights are breached. All existing legislation should be interpreted in such a way as to give effect to the principles contained in the Human Rights Act.
The Human Rights Act has been controversial and has tended to divide public opinion. At one end of the spectrum there are those who believe that the Act gives a licence to some members of society to avoid due legal process; at the other end, some do not think that the Act provides enough protection.
The Basic Human Rights
The fundamental human rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights and adopted by the Human Rights Act include:
- The right to life, (not an absolute right); prohibition of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; prohibition of slavery, (both absolute rights); abolition of the death penalty.
- The right to liberty and security, to a fair trial and to no punishment without law.
- The right to respect for private and family life; the right to marry; the protection of property; the right to education.
- Freedom of thought and religion; freedom of expression; freedom of assembly; right to free elections.
- The prohibition on discrimination in the application of these human rights.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Legal Claims Based on Human Rights
Before the Human Rights Act people who thought that their human rights had been infringed were forced to bring legal claims in the European Court of Human Rights. Human rights claims can now be brought in the UK courts. The Act may also be raised in an existing legal case – for example, as a defence.
If an individual thinks that a public authority has infringed their human rights it is possible that they will have the basis of a legal claim. However, even if a human right has been infringed it does not necessarily mean that a claim will be successful. Any court hearing a human rights case will have to consider not only whether the human right was breached but also whether the public authority was justified in breaching it.
The human rights legislation specifically states that rights most may be overridden and few of the human rights are deemed to be absolute. Therefore a case brought in relation to a breach is likely to fail if the public authority acted in accordance with the law, in the interests of a democratic society or to bring into effect an intention of human rights law.
The starting point where there has been an apparent breach of a human right is to discuss it with the public authority in question. If they have a formal complaints procedure in place this should be followed. If at this stage the individual is still not satisfied with the treatment they have received they may wish to consider legal action. Before starting a claim expert legal advice should be taken on the grounds and merits of the case.
The Courts’ Powers
If a human rights case is successful the court may make various different orders. To some extent these will depend on the type of case that is brought. Depending on the circumstances, a court’s powers include the ability to: quash a public authority’s decision; award damages; quash a conviction; and, to prevent a public authority from carrying out a particular action.
many thanks
D
The school teacher operates a wrist band system 2 bands for 30 children. if the bands are in use the children have to wait.
When a child express 3 time that they are desparate and they are told to wait and refused access is this legal or against their human rights?
The same teacher has told children they must go at break time not during class and that they wiill have to wait.
The chldren are then left in wet clothes all day - too embrassed to say anything - in my view this is surely a lack of duty of care.
I would like advise on where we can go next - we saw the duputy head teacher but it seems nothing has been done to address the issue as other children, after my child, have suffered with wet pants.
Thank you
Their assisted gardening, which I paid for was useless, they did nothing in my back garden! The front they occasionally strimmed. They lied saying they had been to my property 44 times in 3 years, hence why my grass was 3ft high? I don't think so.
many thanks
[2] what do i have if my land lord fail to carry ouy repair to my property that i report to then 2 year in letting me live beneath my need i can do any in flat because of the repair tnat need doing by my land lord who fail do anything about the repair that doing they turn up at my property that i am paying rent for go in to the back garden cut my apple tree down brake my fance down while i was at work no one send me a letter to inform me that they was gonig to carry out work in my garden let alone cut my apple down and i visit there office and complain they inform that there workman now what they are doing these people had no respect for there tenants it not matterhow many time i complain on one do any think about it can you help me i would like to take these people to the human right court.
Kind regards
Zimbabwean, lost a a farm as a result of Mr. Mugabes land reform. My home and that of my parents looted and destroyed. Forced eviction. No recourse through the Courts.
Ths is not only me but many others and also includes all Zimbabweans. Murder torture and abductions continue every day.
Would these and many other instances that are known to have and are taking place in the country be considered violations? If they are is there anything that can be done to ensure that justice is done and how would anyone go about getting this done?
Any help wold be very much appreciated. Iam trying to assist as many Zimbabweans as I can.
Thank you.
Des Muir
Ask Protecting Yourself a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.